If you don’t believe that purposeful, staged and planned false flag events exist? Well, listen to this little neocon creep, Patrick Clawson, of the influential neo-con Washington Institute for Near East Studies. This parasite OPENLY suggests that the US should provoke Iran into taking the first shot, which would be stupid because they have no earthly reason too, but Israel, America’s supposed ally absolutely does. This Israeli lobbyist suggests perpetrating a “false flag” attack on the US to engage us in a war with Iran, which means they’d attack us and blame it on Iran. Given the fact the US media is owned by dual nationals – Israeli’s and American’s – how do you think the propagandists would report such an incident? Cave dwellers, ragheads, terrists…you know the buzz words.
The US has three US Naval Ships either patrolling or heading to the Straits of Hormuz right now and all three are sitting ducks just like the USS Liberty was. If anyone attacks either of these three ships or provokes the US in any other way it is Israel NOT Iran. The sociopathic neocon wetdream is to engage the US in war with Iran. A war that every General, Admiral and Spook has said we do not want to be engaged in especially since every inspector from every country has stated on the record, with no equivocation whatsoever that Iran does not pose any kind of nuclear threat to anyone!
Following is an update provided by By Maidhc Ó Cathail of the The Passionate Attachment blog posted on
September 25, 2012 -
Update: It’s worth noting that op-ed in the Jerusalem Post magazine earlier this year raised the possibility of just such an attack. In a piece entitled “The looming war with Iran,” Avi Perry, who served as an intelligence expert for the Israeli government, confidently predicted:
“Iran, just like Nazi Germany in the 1940s, will take the initiative and “help” the US president and the American public make up their mind by making the first move, by attacking a US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.”
“The Iranian attack on an American military vessel will serve as a justification and a pretext for a retaliatory move by the US military against the Iranian regime. The target would not be Iran’s nuclear facilities. The US would retaliate by attacking Iran’s navy, their military installations, missile silos, airfields. The US would target Iran’s ability to retaliate, to close down the Strait of Hormuz. The US would then follow by targeting the regime itself.”
“Elimination of Iran’s nuclear facilities? Yes. This part would turn out to be the final act, the grand finale. It might have been the major target, had the US initiated the attack. However, under this “Pearl Harbor” scenario, in which Iran had launched a “surprise” attack on the US navy, the US would have the perfect rationalization to finish them off, to put an end to this ugly game.”
“Unlike the latest attempt at an Iranian revolution, this time the US would not shy away, rather, it would go public, openly calling for the Iranian people to join in with the US in working to overthrow the corrupt Islamic fundamentalist regime. The Iranian people would respond in numbers.”
“Spring would reemerge, and the Iranian people would join the rest of the Middle East – this time with the direct support of the US.”
“The greatest irony behind this most significant episode in 2012 is that the Iranian regime would affect their own demise. Attacking the US navy in the open seas is equivalent to carrying out a suicide bombing.”