OPINION
Update: “IT’S THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, STUPID!” w/Susan Daniels
Posted by
June 6, 2011
by Helen Tansey
Back on April 13, 2011, the T-Room predicted that President Obama would soon post a scanned version of what his inner circle would designate as his “Official” long-form birth certificate -
“More importantly, you can’t change a SSN record, but you can certainly create a long-form birth certificate just in time for the 2012 elections. Which is what many are anticipating, and now with Donald Trump entering the fray you can count on such a document entering into the public arena and soon. After all, anyone who has studied this issue knows the Obama camps next step is to embarrass the “birthers” by producing a long-form birth certificate. That would be checkmate wouldn’t it? Of course, it will be a scanned copy just like the COLB, because it will never hold up under the scrutiny of an independent forensic review team of experts, that is someone other than his former employer, the Annenberg’s, so get ready for a repeat of a similar ruse coming to a computer screen near you.”
Viola! On the morning of April 27 the Prez posted a digitized “scanned” image captivating the public’s imagination, yet again. Although we were spot on in making our prediction, we take no pride in having to make it at all, and we were certainly not the only ones doing so. More unnerving about this farcical theater is how sad it all is. It took this man two and a half years, millions of dollars and a countless number of lawsuits later, including the Court Martial of Lt. Col Lakin and trumped up charges of Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick, to post a “picture” that was immediately found to be a really crappy forgery.
But the beat goes on… Many who have become expert students of this miserable game continue to be ridiculed and verbally assaulted for simply pointing out those pesky facts that crush the naysayers/obots laughable drivel. Who knows who pays these trolls and honestly, who really cares. At this point in the game both sides are worn down, one side from lying all of the time and the other defending our constitutional form of government. The naysayers/obots/trolls barely have it in them to keep the shield up and few are flocking to replace them, with one exception, the moron who posts death threats from Port Angeles, Washington over at obamareleaseyourrecords. This obot loon can be traced back to 2008 when he was leveling similar threats on blogger Citizen Wells. Same M.O., same threats and same obot lunacy.
With both sides seemingly taking a short pause in the battle for reality, we thought it a good time to provide you with an update on the “It’s the Social Security Number, Stupid!” front. A lot has been happening with some detail already being reported while other detail has not.
We first caught up with Susan Daniels, Susan Daniels & Associates, on the afternoon of May 21, 2011. Daniels is the private investigator who, after a client’s request, first delved into the Obama SSN and all of the peculiarities surrounding it back in 2009.
Two documents -- One embarrassingly ridiculous and the other tightens the window
Daniels brings our attention to two new documents with the first being an official response from the Social Security Administration to Ms. Daniels request for an investigation into how a legal Hawaiian resident, then Barry Obama, age 15, secured a Connecticut issued Social Security Number. A Mr. Frank Biro, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Public Inquiries, Social Security Administration, issued the formal reply by stating the following “after reviewing the information you provided, we disagree with your conclusion that a person’s Social Security number depends upon the address of a residence.”
That was it. Nothing more. The Acting Associate Commissioner simply stated the Social Security Administration “disagreed” with Daniels understanding of their longstanding application regulations. He cited no code. He cited no regulation. He cited nothing. As a formal representative of the SSA all he states is his disagreement. With what exactly? With their own regulations? What utter nonsense! Put this useless response into the loony circular file.
The next document Daniels highlights is a Social Security Certification of a deceased applicant named Paul Michael Graziano. Mr. Graziano filed his SS-5 application (scroll to page 2) with a Connecticut Social Security office on March 16, 1977. His residential address then was 38 Yorktown Circle, Trumbull, Conn. 06611.
Why is this significant? Well, Mr. Graziano’s SSN is five numbers AFTER Obama’s Connecticut SSN and, again, was filed on March 16, 1977. You may recall in our April post Daniels explaining a Mr. Thomas Wood’s SS-5 Certification form, which immediately preceded Obama’s Connecticut SSN, being applied for on March 21, 1977. Therefore, it is now conclusive that the Connecticut Social Security number Obama secured at the age of 15, and has been using for the last 25 years, was secured in March of 1977 and more narrowly, sometime during the week of March 16 -- 21, 1977.
Timeline -- Wood/Obama/Graziano
SSN REGISTRATION DATE NAME ADDRESS 042-68-4424 March 21, 1977 Thomas Louis Wood Newington, Connecticut 042-68-4425 March ??, 1977 Barack Hussein Obama Honolulu, Hawaii 042-68-4429 March 16, 1977 Paul Michael Graziano Yorktown, Connecticut
Daniels then goes onto explain, “his location in March of 1977 is a quandary because the Social Security regulations, as codified then and today, clearly states ‘If you are age 12 or older and have never received a Social Security Number, you must apply in person.‘
Listen to Part 1 of the T-Room’s interview with Daniels -
In the second part of the Daniels update, she highlights longstanding regulations of the Social Security administration that remain on the SSA.gov site for which Commish Biro simply disagrees.
The first item Daniels discusses is a historical guideline written by a Mr. Crow and Ms. Bennett, experts on the Social Security system including number assignments, which states the following -
‘With few exceptions, each geographical area is assigned a range of area numbers. Area numbers assigned prior to 1972 are an indication of the location of the SSA office which originally issued the SSN. Since 1972 SSNs have been issued centrally and the area number in SSNs assigned since 1972 corresponds to the residence location of the applicant as indicated on the application for the SSN.” (emphasis added)
To be clear, Connecticut’s area numbers are 040 -- 049 and Hawaii’s area numbers are 575 and 576.
Therefore, based on these two SSA regulations one must suspend all rational thought to believe a young 15 year old boy from Honolulu, Hawaii traveled 5015.6 miles, 8071.8 kilometers, 4355.5 nautical miles or took a 10 hour and 25 minute flight to Connecticut, walked into a Connecticut Social Security office with at least “two legal documents” in hand verifying his age, identity, established place of residence in Connecticut and verification of US citizenship.
Nowhere in all of Barry’s travels, his books, articles written about him or his family does anyone even remotely suggest that Barry ever resided in the state of Connecticut nor his grandparents nor any other relatives. Nowhere. And don’t waste good folks time trying to convince intelligent people the SS office in Baltimore, Maryland read the zip code wrong on the application. To suggest this only shows how desperate and dumb you are.
Listen to Part 2 of the Daniels interview to better understand what these regulations mean -
But for the sake of those who have any lingering doubts, let’s take a look at where 15 year old Barry Obama was in March, 1977.
Where was Barry Obama 1977?
Let’s first apply some deductive reasoning here. We certainly know he wasn’t attending a prep school in Connecticut. He wasn’t holding down his first part-time job at a Baskin Robbins in Connecticut either. Nope. In March of 1977 Barry Obama was a sophomore in High School. He was reportedly living with his grandparents, Stanley and Toot aka Tut, attending Punahou Academy in Honolulu, Hawai’i, playing junior varsity basketball and singing in the school’s choir, that is according to Obama’s Hawai’i Neighborhood blog -
Punahou & Educational Factoids:
Years Attended
- 1971: (5th grade) to 1979 (12th grade)
Extra Curricular Activities
- 1975: Plays intermediate football at Punahou as an eighth-grader.
- 1976: Sings in the Punahou Boys’ Chorus One -- 9th grade
- 1977: Sings in the Punahou Concert Choir as a 10th-grader; plays junior varsity basketball
- 1978: Makes the Punahou varsity basketball team as a junior
- 1979: Plays on the state championship basketball team as the only left-hander; writes for Ka Wai Ola, Punahou’s high school literary journal
- 1979: Graduates from Punahou
Which is verified by Punahou Academy -
Years Attended Punahou
1971 (5th grade) to 1979 (12th grade)
Co-curricular Activities
1975 Intermediate Football – 8th grade
1976 Boys’ Chorus One – 9th grade
1977 Concert Choir – 10th grade
1977 Junior Varsity Basketball – 10th grade
1978 Varsity A Basketball
1979 Varsity A Basketball (state champions)
1979 Ka Wai Ola (Punahou’s high school literary journal)
And then you have this story written by a fellow Punahou classmate titled A kid called Barry where this classmate states “Obama soon entered the Academy at Punahou where he juggled new demands and choices: working a part-time job at the neighborhood Baskin-Robbins; singing with the chorale in freshman and sophomore years; playing basketball; and writing for the school literary magazine “Ka Wai Ola.”
According to his alma mater and friends, Barry Obama was definitely attending Punahou Academy located in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1977.
So, we’ve narrowed the question a bit by affirming his whereabouts in 1977, but where was he in “MARCH” of 1977?
Where was, or better yet, wasn’t Barry Obama in March 1977
Let’s take a minute to address some of the fantastical ideas dolts might dream up when trying to explain how a 15 year old, lower to middle-class kid living in Hawaii, who was shooting hoops, singing in the school choir, working a part-time job and doing his homework was the week of March 16 -- 21, 1977.
Let’s first take a quick look at Punahou Academy and what was and was not happening in Barry’s life in March of ’77. First, we know he was on the junior varsity basketball team according to Punahou. Could the team have come to the mainland to play in a tournament? Nope. After speaking with the Punahou Academy’s Athletic Department, the T-Room learned that as a junior varsity basketball player, their season begins roughly in late October to early November and ends early February, that is unless the team goes to state. Punahou Academy’s junior varsity basketball team did go to state in 1977 thereby extending the seasons schedule to mid to late February. So, it’s safe to rule out a school trip in March to the mainland to play in a basketball tourney.
What about Spring Break? Hardly. After speaking to the operator at Punahou Academy, who has been working the switchboard for 18 years, she shared it would be “safe to say” Punahou spring break was/is typically scheduled sometime during one of the last two weeks in March. Recall, the narrow window in which Barry Obama could have flown to Connecticut and walked into a Connecticut SS office to apply for a Connecticut SSN was March 16 to 21. Well, March 21, 1977 fell on the Monday of the fourth week of March, the first of either of the latter two weeks Punahou students would have had off for spring break.
Anything is possible, especially given the fantastical narrative built up around this guy, but when you apply simple logic to such an adventure you quickly realize the magical fairyland we’d have to live in to believe such nonsense. Indeed, one would have to believe this 15 year old kid made visiting a Connecticut SS office his first priority after arriving to the mainland. What, Hawaii didn’t have a SS office back then? Of course they did! His own half-sister Maya has a Hawaiian SSN. Why not half-brother Barry?
To wrap this up, here’s Chris “tingling leg salesman” Matthews telling us why the Dunham’s couldn’t have hardly afforded to send their grandson to Connecticut in March 1977 for spring break, college tours or to secure a mythical Connecticut SSN -
“On MSNBC, Chris Matthews asked if there was “something missing” in Sen. Barack Obama’s “biography that people can identify with.” Matthews continued: “He’s gone from being a poor kid, growing up in Hawaii, in Indonesia, part of his youth, mixed family background, had to struggle, worked with community organizations; went to these incredibly elite schools, Columbia and Harvard Law, making Law Review and all that. He missed the middle part.” Matthews went on to state: “Does he have that experience that people — most Americans have? Does he connect on the basic struggling-class level?…”
Not only were his grandparents “struggling middle classers” but they weren’t stupid! Just ask yourself as a basic part of the struggling class -- would your parents, or grandparents in Barry’s case, have sent you to Hawai’i for a college tour as a sophomore? That’s what I thought. No. Maybe driving a state or two away, but not a full 5015.6 miles, 8071.8 kilometers, 4355.5 nautical miles or a 10 hour and 25 minute flight away from home. And no, Connecticut has never been nor ever will be a spring break destination for a bunch of tenth graders.
Knowing Barry Obama never left the island of Honolulu in March 1977, how in the hell did he “legally” end up with a Connecticut SSN that was issued previously to one born in 1890?
###
IT’S THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER STUPID!
The Post & Email Speaks With Susan Daniels, Private Investigator

12 Comments
This is OUR country and we want it
run honestly for our kids and grandkids.
Surely this president wants the same
thing for his kids and grandkids.
Thus we look forward to him taking to
the forum and EXPLAIN ALL THE IRREGULARITIES
IN HIS DOCUMENTATION!
They talk about WEINER who was just a
disgusting man.
We are talking about a man (OBAMA) who
is absolutely using the power of the WH
to give him power over every man/woman/child.
Mr. President please come forward and
give us an explanation!
The only rational conclusion to draw from Young Barry’s undeniably anomalous Social Security Number is that it is a fraud. The Social Security Administration did not issue it. Adult Barry stole it through his well-known and documented Communist connections in Chicago, knowingly and with malicious intent to deceive.
What is the defendant hiding? I accuse Barack Hussein Obama-Soetoro of not being an American citizen. Of course he was born in Kenya, since there is no record of Hawaiian birth; but that is now a secondary issue.
Absurd as it seems, Obama’s citizenship is a fair question. Most people would agree that it needs a simple honest answer, yes or no, to legitimate Obama’s presidency. So let’s go straight to the source: Summon Obama to explain himself, in court, on the record, under oath, with original, official documentary evidence.
If Obama cannot or will not do this, then by common legal statute he is guilty by default. Failure to address this fundamental issue is an intolerable insult to the American people, and an actionable failure by responsible officers of the federal government to enforce the fundamental principle of equal protection of the law.
This lying imposter must be impeached, convicted, fined, and imprisoned, for the biggest criminal fraud in American history. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, who falsely certified Obama’s eligibility for office, deserve to occupy adjacent cells. All of the U.S. state secretaries who accepted Pelosi’s fraudulent “certification” of eligibility must likewise be dismissed from office with prejudice. The numerous federal judges who have so arrogantly defaulted on their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution by trying the case are co-conspirators. They have forfeited public trust. They must go.
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden certainly knew who Obama was from the beginning. But black skin trumped truth. Biden’s racist response was, “Hey, that’s okay by me.” Try Biden, convict him for contempt on his oath of office, and throw him out too.
Speaker of the House Boehner then steps in to run the government until the 2012 election. Boehner is a Republican replacing a Democrat; sorry, Rats, that’s how you’ve arranged for the chips to fall. This issue is beyond partisan politics.
It is time to end this treasonous farce. On behalf of all American citizens, black and white, I demand that the United States Senate act now to judge Obama as he deserves. Freedom and justice require that we do what we must to preserve the rule of law.
Tulsa Jack – very well stated. Thank you for sharing your well founded understanding of this most treasonous situation thinking American’s have found their selves in.
I’d like to add an item to your list, if I may.
Back in 2009, several citizens submitted to their state Attorney General’s a Memorandum of Complaint to investigate Pelosi, the DNC and Obama for election fraud. Six Republican state A’sG received not only these Complaints, but follow up letters and phone calls all to be ignored.
I personally hand delivered said Complaint to then AG Mims who was replaced by AG Cuccinelli, but I’ve never heard a peep from his office. To be certain my Complaint was entered into Virginia’s public record, I offered testimony before the Viriginia State Election Board detailing the criminal complaint. Then, the board was made up of all Democrat appointee’s. Although the board only deals with civil complaints, I wanted to be certain this criminal complaint made its way into the official record.
Also, prior to the general election, I spoke to then Secretary of the State Board of Elections, Ms. Rodrigues, newly appointed by then Gov. Kaine, and requested she vet Obama as prescribed by law she do. I spoke to her two weeks later to learn she spoke to her lead contact at the FEC who assured her “they” vetted him and that he was eligible. Being a newly appointed secretary with the biggest election to manage in state history on her hands, that is all she felt she needed to assure election fraud wasn’t being committed here in Virginia.
So add to your list those six A’sG who have failed the citizens of their respective states that obviously put politics ahead of the constitution thereby the people.
IMHO, the entire political structure is corrupt and in on this miserable game. I’m confident many didn’t knowingly become enablers but found themselves in such a situation where they had to take part in the cover up.
Your table of SSNs For Woods, Graziano and Obama suggest that the Social Security numbers are issued in “inverse order. That is per your table above:
SSN 042 68 4429 (Graziano) 3/16/77
SSN 042 68 4425 (Obama) 3/??/77
SSn 042 68 4424 (Woods) 3/21/77
IS this the actual practice or is this a mistake or are you checking to see if we’re
??
paying attention
ELmo
Hi Elmo, saw your comment over at ORYR and thought it was a good one. So, I asked Susan her thoughts and here is what she wrote back “I noticed, too, that Graziano’s was dated first but it may have just been a simple case of them stacking up on someone’s desk and being given out of order. Maybe the person who handled them was on
vacation or sick. It’s not a big deal. It doesn’t change the fact that he would have gotten his in March ’77.”
It is odd but I don’t believe there to be anything more than a stack of applications being managed by a clerk to process. Hope this helps.
Here is a link to an article written by JB Williams detailing the efforts by Rep and Dem alike to remove Article II, Presidential eligibility, from the Constitution – here’s a snippet
“Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59 in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128 – “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2 to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678 on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee—All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election. In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511 – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] ”
JB pieces together the beginning of the Congresses treason in this piece of outstanding investigative work. Kudos to JB!
Read the full piece by clicking http://thepatriotsnews.com/indx.php/content/163
Tulsa Jack
I believe there are real threats and not to individuals; but to entire cities.
Read that as you may.
This coup couldn’t have happened here without threats of dire consequences to many.
Just thought I’d mention that my brother and I walked into the same SS office in Central California in the late ’60′s with our ID’s and walked out with our SS numbers, the official card showed in the mail a couple of weeks later. I remember we got our numbers while standing there, as our numbers were 17 digits apart, Mine ended in -30 his in -47. I asked right then and there why they weren’t only one number apart, and was told how the first three were for location, the middle two were coded for something else (that I don’t remember – issuing office?), and the last 4 were individual, and they mixed them up in that office (on purpose) so you didn’t know the # of the person in front of you in line, or the person in back of you. So, certainly 1977, but that particular week in march may not be totally accurate.
Frank, that makes total sense to me, that is scrambling the last four digits to make sure others in front of you or behind couldn’t know your number. I think that’s kinda smart and it offered a level of protection for you and your brother.
It’s the first three numbers that identify location, which you confirm with your own application process. I’m sure those numbers correspond to the state you held a legal residence at that time. Mine does.
Frank,
Good explanation for the number/date “confusion”. I appreciate the help to understand it. Thanks
ELmo
Nathaneal, the T-Room has no desire to post “speculative” information as this is how rumors get started and false information muddies the water. When you have something “concrete” “factual” and solid proof for your assertion, we will be more than happy to give you posting privileges.
Understand, the T-Room has investigated your “speculation” of which you then assert “Occam” to back it up. Well, I can use the “Occam” to back my assertion up so not buying.
As well, you should be ashamed of yourself for spewing such a false and shallow reasoning for why O has in his possession a SSN from a state he’s never resided in, let alone at the tender age of 15 where he was shooting hoops and singing for his school’s choir. Your “speculation” is full of air.
Bring the T-Room the facts and substantiating material and we will be more than happy to work with you, until such time, we’re sticking to the facts that have been substantiated.
I’ll immediately seize your rss as I can not find your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any?
Please allow me understand in order that I could subscribe.
Thanks.
One Trackback
[...] [...]